WHO WE ARE

Our bankruptcy practice is devoted primarily to representing defendants of preference and fraudulent conveyance actions under Sections 547 and 548 of the Bankruptcy Code. Read More…

WHAT WE DO

We have deep knowledge of preference and fraudulent conveyance defense litigation. This means reviewing and analyzing hundreds of preference and fraudulent conveyance judicial opinions issued each and every year. Read more…

ABOUT OUR EXPERTISE

We limit our practice to defending preference and fraudulent conveyance claims. Our dedication works and we can prove it. We represented a nationally known brand, a sportswear manufacturer ... Read More…

Home / * Firm News / Dismissed For No Payment

Dismissed For No Payment

February 1, 2019, Delaware   The Debtor Emerald Oil, Inc. is a company engaged in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the United States.  The Defendant, our client, operates as an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the United States. The company designs, drills, and operates oil and natural gas wells.

The plaintiff sought to recover payments, worth $ 76, 740 from our client, made during the 90 days before the Debtor’s petition date as preferential transfers. Upon review, we found that all the payments were made within the preferential period and there was no base period history in the case. We reviewed the MSA and asserted that the Debtor paid under the terms of MSA, i.e. within 60 days of receipt of invoices. Based on our analysis we showed that all invoices were paid within 60 days and argued that payments under contract term are deemed ordinary. Therefore, the alleged transfers were protected from the plaintiff’s avoidance power under Section 547(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Additionally, we also argued that the Defendant had an inchoate lien. We asserted that the Defendant was a contractor within the MSA and all services provided by the Defendant to the Debtor constitutes services protected by the North Dakota Century Code Title 35-24 Well or Pipeline Construction Lien. NDCC § 35-24.

Based on our defenses the plaintiff agreed to dismiss the case for no payment.