We limit our practice to defending preference and fraudulent conveyance claims. Our dedication works, and we can prove it:
- We represented a nationally known brand, a sportswear manufacturer, against a $900,000.00 preference lawsuit. The case was dismissed with no payment after discovery. In that case, we successfully argued the rarely effective contemporaneous exchange defense as well as a paid new value argument.
- We successfully defended a large air conditioning company against a preference lawsuit in Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The defendant argued successfully based on our convincing ordinary course defense. This case was dismissed by the plaintiff without cost of a trial.
- We represented a Florida power services company as a defendant in a preference lawsuit in New York Southern District Bankruptcy Court. The amount of the claim was over $440,000.00. The case was dismissed with no payment based on our relentless representation.
- We represented a nationally known client in the trade show business sued for preference by a large diamond manufacturer. The case was dismissed with no payment. In that case, we were able to prove that the Trustee had failed to prove all elements of section 547(a) of the preference laws. Again, this was dismissed by the Trustee with no trial.
- We represented a nationally known business consultant against a fraudulent conveyance sanction brought by a Trustee in New Jersey Bankruptcy Court. The case was settled for a nominal amount after extensive discovery showed the value of our client’s services.
- As counsel for a Toronto based logistics Company, we settled a $220,000.00 preference action brought by a Trustee in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, for $1,500.00. The case was settled based on a successful combination of ordinary course and new value defenses.